Issue papers aim to provide critical knowledge on important quitline topics and guidance for decision-making.
This paper aims to present evaluation and research data used to guide decision-making on ways to invest limited funding for quitline services most effectively in an easy-to-use format and to make recommendations for most effectively using limited resources when determining quitline service offering options. Specifically, the paper addresses the following questions:
1) How effective are different service offering models regarding quitline utilization, tobacco abstinence rates, and costs? Are there points at which the return on investment diminishes in terms of amount of counseling (attempted and completed) and medication provided?
2) What impact does the provision of medications through quitlines have on reach and quit rates? Which mechanisms for dosing and delivery of medications are most cost-effective and/or provide other efficiencies?
3) Is there evidence to support the use of advanced technologies (web, interactive voice response [IVR] and texting) to expand quitline service offerings? Are these approaches cost-effective? What other efficiencies are achieved?
view issue paper(PDF 717KB)
summary(PDF 464 KB)
for research(PDF 383 KB)
table(PDF 323 KB)
This issue paper is is a systematic review of the scientific evidence regarding cessation services to priority populations (African Americans/blacks (AA/B), American Indian and Alaska Natives (AI/AN), Asian American and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders (API), Hispanic/Latinos (H/L), the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community, and individuals of low socioeconomic status (low SES)
) with a specific focus on the use
of quitlines. The review attempts to provide lessons learned from the scientific evidence in order to better inform decision making within quitlines.view issue paper
Performing cost-effectiveness analyses is an essential element of any quitline’s quality improvement process. This is especially true as budgetary constraints become more important to determining all aspects of service delivery. This issue paper aims to:
· document the facts related to the cost of tobacco use;
· provide an overview of methods currently used for cost-effectiveness analysis of quitlines; and
· in general terms, describe approaches and considerations for conducting cost-effectiveness analysis on a specific quitline program.
This paper is intended to present general information useful for a wide variety of stakeholders and not to serve as a guide for performing cost-effectiveness analyses. view issue paper
(PDF 125KB)view table 1
(PDF 7.36KB)view table 2
(PDF 7.14KB)view table 3
This issue paper defines the most critical operational, service performance and efficiency-related call center metrics for establishing and maintaining quitline quality. The paper, authored by Penny Reynolds of The Call Center School (http://www.thecallcenterschool.com/
), makes recommendations on important metrics to measure (including why they are important for funders, service providers and callers); recommendations on how to measure and report these metrics; and describes how these reports may be used by both the service providers and funders to improve quality.
The purpose of this paper is to propose a framework for improving the quality of quitlines and to describe the major elements of the framework. The framework highlights the shared responsibilities of funders and service providers alike and makes recommendations that encourage collaborative efforts to move quality improvement forward.
This paper provides a comprehensive review of the current literature and practice related to the integration of tobacco cessation medications and quitline services. The authors discuss the major factors that must be considered in deciding if medications should be offered as part of quitline services including such topics as cost-effectiveness analysis, choice of medication, determination of quantity of medication to provide and the method of distribution of medications that will be used. Recommendations on key issues related to integration of medications into quitline services are also highlighted.
This paper provides a comprehensive review of the current literature on a wide variety of strategies to increase reach of tobacco cessation quitlines. Additionally, several examples from practice are included. The paper also highlights recommendations for quitline reach and funding levels from key government and health agencies, highlighting the need to increase reach to more tobacco users to save lives and direct medical costs.
This paper recommends a standard definition of "reach” and provides recommendations for standard measuring and reporting of the reach of quitline programs. Recommendations that are necessary in order to implement the standard are found in bold-print and recommendations that are viewed as important but not critical to implementation are italicized.
This paper provides a standard formula for measuring quit rates for quitline programs and recommends standard reporting methods as well. Recommendations that are necessary in order to implement the standard are found in bold-print and recommendations that are viewed as important but not critical to implementation are italicized.
Tobacco use is the single most preventable cause of death and disease in the U. S., causing approximately 438,000 deaths each year. Quitlines are telephone-based tobacco cessation services that help tobacco users quit through a variety of services, including counseling, medications, information and self-help materials. Quitline effectiveness is documented by numerous research studies. Through the leadership of state and federal governments, quitlines have become increasingly popular in the U.S. due to their centralization, cost-effectiveness and ability to reach tobacco users in rural and urban areas. With state budget cuts on the rise, the ability of quitlines to provide evidence-based tobacco cessation services is under threat. Yet, without adequate, sustained funding for quitlines, tobacco use prevalence is unlikely to decline. This NAQC Issue Paper makes the case for quitline investment and sustainability.
An emerging issue related to quitline sustainability is third-party reimbursement for quitline services. As part of a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), NAQC developed an issue paper on third-party reimbursement of quitlines to serve as a resource to NAQC members and tobacco control partners. Due to differences in healthcare financing in the U.S. and Canada, this project focuses solely on U.S. quitlines. This paper assesses the current practices of quitlines with regard to third-party reimbursement and other forms of financial support, provides an overview of the opportunities for obtaining third party support and sets next steps for garnering third-party financial support for quitlines.