During the webinar, implications of the recent article by Ferguson et al. published in the British Medical Journal describing a 2x2 randomized study conducted in the UK comparing standard quitline care to proactive counseling, and provision of NRT to no NRT will be discussed. Presentations will include a summary of the study design and findings, as well as formal responses from Dr. Shu-Hong Zhu (UCSD) and Dr. Bruce Baskerville (University of Waterloo).
|
4/26/2012
|
When:
|
April 26 11:00 am ET - 12:00 pm ET
|
|
« Go to Upcoming Event List
|
|
Discussion of Implications of the New Article on Quitlines and NRT This webinar took place on April 26, 2012. You can download related materials using the links below.
Agenda Presentation Slides (Jessie Saul) BMJ Article - "Effect of offering different levels of support and free nicotine replacement therapy via an English national telephone quitline: randomized controlled trial" BMJ Article Editorials Webinar Summary Position Statement
What was covered during this seminar? During the webinar, implications of the recent article by Ferguson et al. published in the British Medical Journal describing a 2x2 randomized study conducted in the UK comparing standard quitline care to proactive counseling, and provision of NRT to no NRT were discussed. The authors conclude that "offering free nicotine replacement therapy or additional (proactive) counselling to standard helpline support had no additional effect on smoking cessation.”
Presentations included a summary of the study design and findings, as well as formal responses from Dr. Shu-Hong Zhu (UCSD) and Dr. Bruce Baskerville (University of Waterloo). Strengths and weaknesses of the study, as well as implications for quitlines in a North American context were discussed. For more information, please visit the Research Call Page.
|
|