Comparing POD and MOD Ends Users' Product Characteristics, Use Behaviors, and Nicotine Exposure. 
				Friday, March 17, 2023  		
		 Posted by: Natalia Gromov		
	
			 
			
			
			 
				Felicione
NJ, Kaiser L, Leigh NJ, Page MK, Block AC, Schurr BE, O'Connor RJ, Goniewicz ML. 
Comparing POD and MOD Ends
Users' Product Characteristics, Use Behaviors, and Nicotine Exposure.
 Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Feb 9;25(3):498-504. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac211. PMID:
36073762; PMCID: PMC9910144. 
 
Introduction. POD
electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), often containing high
concentrations of nicotine salts, have replaced MODs (ie, open/modifiable
devices) as the most popular devices. The purpose of this study was to compare
device/liquid characteristics, use behavior, and nicotine exposure between POD
and MOD users. 
Methods. Data
from the initial visit of a prospective observational study of exclusive ENDS
users compared MOD (n = 48) and POD (n = 37) users. Participants completed
questionnaires on demographic characteristics, patterns of ENDS use, and ENDS
features. A urine sample was collected to test for cotinine and an ENDS liquid
sample was collected to test for nicotine and salts. Puff topography was
captured during an ad libitum bout at the end of the session. 
Results. MOD
and POD users did not differ on demographic characteristics. MOD users reported
purchasing more liquid in the past month than POD users (180.4 ± 28.0 vs. 50.9
± 9.0 ml, p < .001). Differences in characteristics of devices used by MOD
and POD users included flavor type (p = .029), nicotine concentration (liquids
used by MOD users contained less nicotine than those used by POD users: 8.9 ±
2.0 vs. 41.6 ± 3.2 mg/ml, p < .001), and presence of the nicotine salt
(fewer MOD liquids had salts present than POD liquids: 11.9% vs. 77.4%, p <
.001). User groups did not differ on urinary cotinine levels or puff topography
(ps > .05). 
Conclusions. Despite
different characteristics of MOD and POD ENDS, users of those products are
exposed to similar amounts of nicotine, likely due to using more liquid among
MOD users. 
Implications. This
study directly compares ENDS product characteristics, user behavior, and
nicotine exposure between MOD and POD ENDS users. Although POD products
contained higher nicotine concentrations compared to MOD products, users of
PODs reported consuming less liquid than MOD users. Ultimately, MOD and POD
users were exposed to similar levels of nicotine, suggesting users behaviorally
compensate for differences in product characteristics. 
 
 
			 |